Ill be unbanned soon so ill help out lol.

I stopped reading her posts after the ridiculous way she responded to my B12 post and I stopped talking to her a little before that. So I won't be reading her McDonalds comment unless my eyes fall on it accidentally, and she won't be hearing from me at all. I do have something I want to say to Wolf though so I'll have at least one more post on that thread.

I think it's best we drop it. I doubt anything would change her mind. And after what she just posted, I'm pretty sure we would get nowhere.

[quote="Paj]:lol: That's quite alright. I don't mind. I just would like to know what this lady's qualifications are. She comes to this site with two guns blazing, criticizing methods and food as if she was an unquestionable renown food critic and we the McDonald's chefs and all she uses is data that has been misunderstood (protein studies), obsolete and questionable (1998! and written by 'experts' when we all know there is no such thing when it comes to parrot dietary needs -not even in 2016), unsubstantiated by links (B12 need and site of production), or from species that cannot compare (chickens and humans) and all without even opening herself to scrutiny by introducing herself and telling us what food and methods she uses. Not what one would call a good debater to say the least.

To be honest, tielfan, I think that the real reason why you don't want to address my postings is because I am able to refute all your points...[/quote]

Sorry Jessi but I just skipped most of your post because I'm not interested in reading any more of her comments lol. I posted one last thing for Wolf. He seems sincere but he's not providing any evidence either. If he has anything significant to say I'll talk to him, but otherwise I'm through. Honestly I think he's seriously confused about the difference between problems caused by fat and problems caused by protein, and I think it might have been the word "lipoprotein" that threw him off. Lipoproteins are synthesized in the body. They're related to fat metabolism and have no relationship to dietary protein that I can see.

Ignore Paj. She just turned it around on you and said that YOU are the one ignoring her claims because you know that she can prove you wrong. Pointless women who started an argument with Brandon. Just like I was quick to join that forum is the same way I'm leaving.

Ill be leaving too only I be making a thread about why I'm leaving lol.

It was basically more nitpicking and saying: "I think you don't want to read my posts because I can counter all of your evidence", which seems to be quite the opposite of what actually happened (As Baruch suddenly became a ninja and pointed out beforehand ). One of the nit picks was about one of the studies being done in 1998. I questioned this, asking why we learn about older studies, as the most recent ones would seem more relevant.

I try to ignore Paj when it came to these topics. I mainly stick around for Liz and Wolf, as they are both very nice regulars on the forum, and pleasant to talk to. I'll have chit-chats with Paj, but mainly on stuff we actually agree on.

Thanks for the ninja compliment.

It's common for people like her to claim victory after they've been utterly defeated. The smart readers will know what really happened and I don't care what the dumb ones think.

I hope that Wolf will look into my information long enough to realize that he's made a mistake and he'll stop spreading wrong information. But my hopes aren't high. He ought to remember enough about his own research to find at least one link in favor of his position without spending a lot of time on it, but he hasn't provided anything. I don't know how good they are on other subjects, but for those who are staying in this group I would recommend not listening to any of their dietary advice unless you can independently confirm that it's actually right.

A portrait of B in action:


I knew I'd have a chance to use that one someday.